Sawgrass Mutual Insurance Co. v. Mone

Sawgrass Mutual Insurance Company (“Sawgrass”) appeals the final judgment awarding attorney’s fees and costs against it and in favor of Appellees and their counsel. Sawgrass raises tWo issues. First, it contends that the trial court erred by applying a contingency risk multiplier to Ap-pellees’ award of attorney’s fees. Second, Sawgrass argues, and Appellees agree, that there was a lack of competent substantial evidence to support the award of $26,918.43 in court costs regarding the services provided by two of Appellees’ expert witnesses, Nettles & Associates and Reliable Field Services of…