Dobson v. Rosencranz
Appellate Court of Illinois
1DissentAlloy, J.
I cannot agree with the conclusion of my colleagues in this case. I do not believe that determination of the propriety of the action of the trial judge in the granting of the new trial involves a substitution by the trial court of his conclusion in opposition to one which the jury has properly reached.
Both parties agree that the only issue before this court is whether the trial court properly exercised the trial court’s broad discretion in allowing a new trial. It is apparent that a trial judge is justified in granting a new trial where the plaintiff fails to prove his case by the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kahn v. James Burton Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1955
- Finley v. New York Central RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
- Mattice v. KlawansIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
- Jacobson v. National Dairy Products Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1961
- Read v. CummingsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1945
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.