Legal Opinion

City of Vancouver v. Wintler

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1894No. 1140PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from, Superior Court, Clarke County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Stiles, J.

— The respondent, a city of the third class, seeks in this action to foreclose certain liens for street assessments against parcels of land abutting on the street and owned in severalty by the appellants. There were originally three separate actions, but under stipulation they came up as one case.

1. The first point made by appellants is, that the general ordinance governing street assessments was void because not passed in the manner required by the statute* The law governing the passage qf ordinances is contained in Gen. Stat., § 635, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Tacoma v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Town of Sumner v. PeeblesWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Green v. City of TacomaU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Washington · 1892

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Davis v. SilvertonOregon Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Tennent v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. City of New Whatcom v. Bellingham Bay Improvement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1894
  4. State ex rel. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Raborn v. MishWashington Supreme Court · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API