Legal Opinion

Smith v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 15, 1976No. 2-57424PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Chief Justice.

Defendant-insurer and its agent raise three issues for reversal of $10,000 judgment entered on jury verdict for plaintiff in action alleging negligence by the insurance agent in executing an insurance policy. We affirm.

Plaintiff, Ted Smith, as administrator of the estate of his son, Gayle Smith, filed an action in two “counts” against defendants, State Farm Automobile Insurance Company and its agent, Leo Lenz, for recovery of accidental death benefits. When this action was commenced and this appeal pursued, rule 79, Rules of Civil Procedure used the word “division” rather…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Duffie v. Bankers' Life Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  2. Wilden Clinic, Inc. v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  3. Zimmerman v. Robinson & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  4. Wolfswinkel v. GesinkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  5. Collegiate Manufacturing Co. v. McDowell's Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1972

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Clark-Peterson Co. v. Independent Insurance Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  2. Dennis Langwith And Ben Langwith, Individuals v. American National General Insurance Company, A Corporation American National Property And Casualty Co., A Corporation And Janet Fitzgerald, Individually And D/b/a American National Janet Fitzgerald Insurance ServicesSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  3. Bolinger v. KiburzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  4. Tatum v. St. Louis Metro Delivery, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Carroll's Warehouse Paint Stores, Inc. v. Rainbow Coatings Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API