Legal Opinion · Dissent

Southern Farm Bureau Life Insurance v. Cowger

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 18, 1988No. 87-300Published

1DissentSteele Hays, Justice

Nothing in the majority opinion justifies overruling the established principle of Arkansas insurance law that to deny recovery an insurer must show a causal connection between a fact misrepresented in an application for life insurance and the subsequent loss. While this principle appeared in National Old Line Ins. Co. v. People, 256 Ark. 137, 506 S.W.2d 12 (1974), as an interpretation of the Arkansas Insurance Code of 1959, it actually has been a part of Arkansas law since it was first stated in Inter-Ocean Casualty Co. v. Huddleston, 184 Ark. 1129, 458 S.W. 23 (1932). A doctrine so well…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Old Republic Insurance Company v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  2. Kroh Bros. Development Co. v. State Line Eighty-Nine, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. National Old Line Insurance Company v. PeopleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  4. Shivers v. Moon Distributors, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
  5. Inter-Ocean Casualty Co. v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API