Darden v. Nashville
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HICKS, Circuit Judge.
Action by Hobart M. Darden, appellant, under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (title 45-, U. S. Code, e. 2, §§ 51-5-9- [45 US CA §§ '51-59']), against Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Company to recover damages for personal injuries. The question is whether the court erred in granting appellee’s motion for a directed verdict.
The accident occurred in what is known as the Sixth street yard and engine terminal of appellee at Paducah, Ky., at about 10 :30 on the morning of April 16, 1930. In this yard, which is located between Fifth and Eighth streets, there…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Narramore v. Cleveland, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1899
- American Bridge Co. v. SeedsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
- Finalyson v. Utica Mining & Milling Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895
- Chesapeake & O. R. v. HennesseyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1899
- Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. WyerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of Edmond v. WashamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Grosscupp v. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co.District Court, D. Wyoming · 1936
- Reid v. Grand Trunk Western R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934