Legal Opinion

Darden v. Nashville

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 29, 1934No. 6412PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HICKS, Circuit Judge.

Action by Hobart M. Darden, appellant, under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (title 45-, U. S. Code, e. 2, §§ 51-5-9- [45 US CA §§ '51-59']), against Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Company to recover damages for personal injuries. The question is whether the court erred in granting appellee’s motion for a directed verdict.

The accident occurred in what is known as the Sixth street yard and engine terminal of appellee at Paducah, Ky., at about 10 :30 on the morning of April 16, 1930. In this yard, which is located between Fifth and Eighth streets, there…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Narramore v. Cleveland, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1899
  2. American Bridge Co. v. SeedsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  3. Finalyson v. Utica Mining & Milling Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895
  4. Chesapeake & O. R. v. HennesseyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1899
  5. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. WyerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Edmond v. WashamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  2. Grosscupp v. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co.District Court, D. Wyoming · 1936
  3. Reid v. Grand Trunk Western R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API