Legal Opinion

Stembridge v. Harwitz

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 19, 1974No. 74-339PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant, who was plaintiff in the trial court, has appealed a final judgment declaring unconstitutional a municipal ordinance of the City of North Miami. The only point presented on appeal is "whether or not the court erred in declaring § 8-19 of the City of North Miami Code unconstitutional.”

The trial court’s findings in this case are as follows:

* * * * * . *

“ . . . the Court finds:
“1. That Section 8-19 of the City of North Miami Code of Ordinance, (plaintiff’s Exhibit 2) challenged as being unconstitutional, is as follows:

‘It shall be unlawful for any candidate or other person, during…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. L. Maxcy, Inc. v. MayoSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  2. Walsingham v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  3. State ex rel. C. P. O. Mess v. GreenSupreme Court of Florida · 1965

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rogers v. State Bd. of Med. ExaminersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  2. City of Clearwater v. STUDEBAKER'S D. CL.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API