Washington v. State

For the second time,1 we reverse the trial court’s summary denial of Appellant’s rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. Appellant’s motion alleging that his counsel was ineffective still has not been refuted by the exhibits attached to the State’s amended response and incorporated into the trial court’s amended order of denial. Therefore, the amended order denying relief is reversed and remanded to the trial court for an evidentia-ry hearing.

Appellant was charged with armed robbery of a convenience store clerk. A police detective testified he showed six pictures to the victim and told…