Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Reineke v. Reineke

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 17, 1993No. 92-3333Published

1Concurrence

SMITH, Judge,

specially concurring.

In my view, the claims of appellee Mary Reineke must fail based upon the express language of the 1981 final dissolution judgment and the specific provisions of the existing Bankers Life policy, the only insurance policy that could possibly be affected by the final judgment of 1981. As noted by Judge Mickle in his opinion, the final judgment ordered David Reineke to maintain the “present insurance policies,” or the “insurance policies presently in effect” on his life. Only the Bankers Life policy was a “present” insurance policy, or a policy “presently in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Harris v. ByardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API