Legal Opinion

Vinz v. Nord

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1945No. File No. 8744PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, P.J.

The plaintiffs, citizens and taxpayers of South Dakota, are engaged in farming operations within the state. In the course of these operations they purchase gasoline and fuel for use in tractors upon their farms. Under the provisions of the Motor Fuel Act, SDC 57.38, as amended by Ch. 351, Laws 1941, rights have and will continue to accrue to them to receive refunds from the state of sums paid as excise tax on such fuel so used. They allege that -the defendants in their capacity as officers of the state have been deducting from refunds so accruing to plaintiffs a tax under the Use Tax Act, Ch.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Sioux Falls Motor Co. v. WelshSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  2. State v. SankeySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. KozlowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  2. Northwestern National Bank of Sioux Falls v. GillisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Van Emmerik v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Hern v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  5. Loel Lust Chevrolet Co. v. Commissioner of RevenueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API