Legal Opinion

Lindemann v. F. W. Woolworth Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided September 22, 1939PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.

The plaintiff-respondent, Eudolph Lindemann, recovered a judgment in the Hudson County Court of Com mon Pleas against the defendant-appellant, F. W. Woolworth Company (hereinafter called Woolworth Co.), for personal injuries suffered by him as a result of a fall on the sidewalk on Bloomfield street, Hoboken, in front of premises occupied by Woolworth Co. as lessee. Woolworth Co. appealed to the Supreme Court where the judgment was affirmed, 121 N. J. L. 614. From that affirmance comes this appeal.

We conclude that the Supreme Court was in…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Longi v. Raymond-Commerce Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  2. Coll v. BernsteinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  3. Andresen v. BurbankNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Walushen v. MaffeyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
  5. Dunellen, et al. v. Power Test Realty, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API