Legal Opinion

Mull v. Boyle

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 9, 1918No. 21,343PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Clark district court; Littleton M. Day, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

Henry Mull, the owner of a tract of land, agreed with James, Charles and Ed Boyle that they were to grow a crop of wheat thereon, delivering to him one-third thereof. The.agreement was carried out. Mull thereafter brought an action against the Boyles, alleging that they had, for their own benefit, pastured cattle upon the growing wheat between November and March, and asking judgment for $120, which he alleged to be one-third of the value of the pasturage. An objection to the introduction of evidence upon this part of the petition was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sayers v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  2. Corey v. StruveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  3. Hansen v. HansenNebraska Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Black v. ScottMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wyandt v. MerrillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  2. Koch v. MurphySupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  3. Lamb v. LemonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  4. Krug v. KorielCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API