Legal Opinion

Stern v. Stern

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1968Published

1Opinion of the CourtNathaniel T. Helman, J.

By this application, one of two defendants named in an action for absolute divorce seeks an order under CPLR 1003 striking his name as a defendant in the action and amending the summons and complaint and all other proceedings by deleting his name from the title of the action.

The moving defendant was served with a summons and notice, in an action whose objective was an absolute divorce based on charges of abandonment and adultery. It is plaintiff’s claim that movant was named as a corespondent, and that it is contemplated that he will be charged in the forthcoming complaint with an adulterous…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Boller v. BollerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  2. Simons v. SimonsNew York Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Leitner v. LeitnerNew York Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API