Legal Opinion

Wiggins v. Rush

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1971No. 9235PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MONTOYA, Justice.

This is a suit wherein the plaintiff-appellee Walt Wiggins, hereinafter called'' “Mr. Wiggins,” in an action for a declaratory judgment, filed a complaint against his wife Roynel F. Wiggins, hereinafter called “Mrs. Wiggins,” Wilfred E. Rush, hereinafter called “Mr. Rush,” and others, the latter being the grantors of three deeds to certain property wherein Mr. and Mrs. Wiggins were the grantees. Mr. Wiggins alleged the property was his sole and separate property. Appellant Mr. Rush was the only answering defendant in the case and he contends that the property in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Beals ex rel. Walker v. AresNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Van Maren v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Fazzio v. KriegerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
  4. McDonald v. SennNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Forsythe v. PaschalArizona Supreme Court · 1928

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Swink v. FingadoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Estate of Fletcher v. JacksonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Hughes v. HughesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Allen v. AllenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Corley v. CorleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API