Legal Opinion

Ward v. Tuttle

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1913No. 7,799PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Prom Putnam Circuit Court; James L. Clark, Special Judge. Action by Charles W. "Ward against Clarence A. Tuttle. Prom a judgment for defendant, the plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtIbach, J.

This was an action brought by appellant against appellee to quiet title to certain real estate in Clay County, Indiana. Appellee, by his cross-complaint, set up that he was the owner of the real estate described in the complaint. The court found for appellee on the issues joined on the complaint, and also on the issues joined on the cross-complaint found that appellee was the owner in fee simple of an undivided one-third in the value of the real estate in question, that the claim of appellant is unfounded and without right, and that appellee is entitled to have his title quieted.

The sole…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ray v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Sinclair v. GunzenhauserIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Donaldson v. State ex rel. TaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Tuttle v. ChurchmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Davis v. StonestreetIndiana Supreme Court · 1853

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Coal Bluff Mining Co. v. McMahonIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Monon Coal Co. v. RiggsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API