Legal Opinion

Morgan, Beauzay, Hammer, Ezgar, Bledsoe & Rucka v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 22, 1976No. Civ. 38527PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KANE, J.

Petitioner, a law firm, seeks review of an order of the board denying its petition for reconsideration of that portion of an award allowing $2,250 for legal services rendered to its client, a claimant for workers’ compensation benefits.

Petitioner represented Harry Schneiderman, a claimant who allegedly sustained injury to his heart arising out of and occurring in the course of his employment as an automobile parts man by respondent Paul Swanson Ford, and secured a recovery for him consisting of four months of temporary total disability, permanent disability of 78 percent…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Robert G. Beloud, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  2. Bentley v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Reich, Adell, Crost & Perry v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  2. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  3. Wheeler & Beaton v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API