Uhlmann v. Wren
Arizona Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceBernstein, Justice
(specially concurring).
I cannot agree with the reasoning by which the majority reaches its result. The condemnation involved in this suit is for a transmission line necessary for the delivery of interchange power to the Salt River Project. I agree with the majority that the Salt River Project is a municipal corporation for all purposes relevant to this case- I also agree that the condemnation procedure used here is lawful.
The only question in this case is whether Salt River Project has authority to condemn the land described in its petition in the Superior Court. We need not pass upon the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Ivanhoe Irrigation District v. McCrackenSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Kaukauna Water Power Co. v. Green Bay & Mississippi Canal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- City of Mesa v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- Zinc Carbonate Co. v. First National Bank of ShullsburgWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- Local 266, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1954
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.