Lail v. Bishop
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GIVENS, Justice.
The substance of the facts as found by the Board portrays that appellant was, and for several years prior to April 15, 1949, had been engaged in trucking lumber at Twin Falls, generally with one truck driven by himself. For a short time he had an additional truck driven by his wife. He employed no one. In a small way, he bought and sold lumber at retail, having no place of business other than his home.
Following negotiations, he entered into a prospective partnership with G. T. New-comb to commence April 16, to conduct a retail lumber yard. April 12 appellant employed…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Flynn v. CarsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
- Orr v. Boise Cold Storage Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1932
- Rabideau v. CramerIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
- Dillard v. JonesIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
- Dawson v. Joe Chester Artificial Limb Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Manning v. Win Her Stables, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1967
- Brown v. Arrington Const. Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1953
- Wachtler v. CalnonIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
- Vogl v. SmytheIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
- Brown v. Arrington Const. Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1953