Battle Creek Coal & Coke Co. v. Martin
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Chiee Justice Creen
delivered the opinion of the Court.
Proceeding under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, the defendant in error recovered a judgment for the benefit of herself and children on account of the death of her husband, which occurred while he was in the employ of plaintiff in error. It is assigned for error in this court that there is no evidence to sustain the judgment below and that the trial judge improperly excluded evidence of an autopsy held over the body of the deceased.
The deceased was a coal miner working for the plaintiff in error, and was found dead in the latter’s…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Vester Gas Range & Mfg. Co. v. LeonardTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
- Wehle v. United States Mutual Accident Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Smith v. Van Noy Interstate Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1923
- State v. HigginsTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
3Cited by13 opinions
- Tidwell v. Chattanooga Boiler & Tank Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1931
- Oren v. Swift CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
- McBrayer v. Dixie Mercerizing Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1941
- Hagewood v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1960
- Sucesión de Vicente Rodríguez v. Comisión IndustrialSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1938
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.