Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Dunie

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 20, 1953No. Appeals, 221 and 222PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Reno, J.,

This appeal lies in the groove of Com. v. Kimmel, 172 Pa. Superior Ct. 76, 92 A. 2d 247, and Com. v. Miller, 172 Pa. Superior Ct. 82, 92 A. 2d 249, in which allocaturs were refused. Appellant, a junk dealer, purchased scrap materials from the Armstrong Cork Company and through a corrupt agreement with Frank E. Hauck, Armstrong’s yard master, secured large quantities of materials without paying for them. With Hauck, he was indicted for conspiracy; Hauck pleaded guilty; and appellant was found guilty. On another indictment, he was charged with fraudulent conversion, larceny,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Holly v. AsheSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Commonwealth v. KirkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Commonwealth v. KirkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Commonwealth v. DonnellySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  5. Commonwealth v. CorcoranSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Commonwealth v. HorvathSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Commonwealth v. NeffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. Commonwealth v. VolkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Commonwealth v. COHENSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API