Legal Opinion · Dissent

Chapman v. Olbrich

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided February 1, 2007No. 14-05-00056-CVPublished

1DissentJ. Harvey Hudson, Justice

One who seeks specific performance of a real estate contract must prove that he has diligently and timely performed or tendered performance of all obligations set forth in the contract. Graves v. Alders, 132 S.W.3d 12, 18 (TexApp.-Beaumont 2004, pet. denied). Because the Olbrichs did not tender their own performance un*497der the real estate contract at issue, I respectfully dissent.

It is well established that specific performance is an equitable remedy. Bell v. Rudd, 144 Tex. 491, 191 S.W.2d 841, 843 (1946). Specific performance is not a matter of right, but, instead, a matter of grace within…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. San Saba Energy, L.P. v. Crawford, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
  2. Baucum v. Great American Insurance Co. of New YorkTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Burford v. PoundersTexas Supreme Court · 1947
  4. 17090 Parkway, Ltd. v. McDavid, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2002
  5. Roundville Partners, L.L.C. v. Jones, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API