Legal Opinion

Scott v. Mills

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided September 15, 1895PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Arapahoe County.

1Opinion of the CourtThomson, J.

The appellant was a married woman, living -with her husband, but doing business in her own name. The appellee, a creditor, brought suit against her to recover his debt, and attached a horse used and kept by her for the purpose of carrying on her business. She claimed the animal as exempt from seizure under the writ, and a trial of her claim resulted in judgment against her, from which she appeals to this court.

Our statute makes provision for exemptions in favor of two classes of persons; namely, those who are heads of families, and those who are not. General Statutes, sec. 1865. The appellant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wells v. CaywoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1877
  2. Martin v. BondSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Daniels v. BenedictCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
  2. Town of Clinton v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  3. Hedlund v. HedlundSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930
  4. Tuttle v. ShuttsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  5. Board of County Commissioners v. SandersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1899

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API