Legal Opinion

Roi Thi Do v. Lincoln Benefit Life Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 15, 2013No. 2D12-2142Published

1Opinion of the Court

VILLANTI, Judge.

Roi Thi Do and Chau Thai Ha, the plaintiffs below, appeal the trial court’s summary judgment in favor of Lincoln Benefit Life Company. We affirm because there were no material issues of disputed facts precluding summary judgment on the issues of whether the application for life insurance was signed by the insured and whether the insured did not consent in writing to the insurance contract and its terms.

This case arose from Lincoln’s refusal to pay life insurance benefits to Thi Do and Thai Ha. Thi Do was the daughter of Van Do, an elderly Vietnamese man who sought to purchase…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Davis-Watkins Company, Plaintiff-Counter and Amana Refrigeration, Inc., Counter v. Service Merchandise, Defendant-CounterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
  2. Unruh v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  3. American Home Assur. v. PLAZA MATERIALSSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  4. Wren v. New York Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  5. Hilfiger v. Transamerica Occidental Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API