David B. Roberts, Ins. v. Capitol Chevrolet Co.
Connecticut Superior Court
1Opinion of the CourtCornell, J.
These facts appear: The General Motors Holding Corporation was named as a defendant in the cause. It is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, its principal office and place of business being in the City of New York. It has never complied with the provisions of General Statutes, Revision 1930, Sec. 3489 and so is not authorized to do business in this State. General Statutes, Revision 1930, §3491. Unless its ownership of certain shares of stock issued by The Sloate-Chevrolet Company and Britain Motor Sales Company — both Connecticut corporations — may be…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Receivers Middlesex Banking Co. v. Realty Investment Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Chzrislonk v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
- Harris v. WeedSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
- Leventhal Furniture Co. v. Crescent Furniture Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
3Cited by2 opinions
- Farricielli v. SlavinConnecticut Superior Court · 1941
- Farricielli v. SlavinPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1941