Legal Opinion

Indiana Mutual Fire Insurance v. Conner

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1854PublishedCited by 6 opinions

ERROR to the Hamilton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtStuart, J.

The insurance company sued Cornier on his premium note. The defendant filed the general issue and four special pleas. Demurrer to the special pleas overruled, and judgment for the defendant. The insurance company brings the case to this Court.

It appears that on the 29th of March, 1843, Conner effected an insurance with the plaintiff upon certain property in Indianapolis, for 3,000 dollars, receiving a policy *171and giving the note now sued upon, for 180 dollars; the policy and the note being the consideration, each for the other, and thus one contract. The declaration sets out the substance of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. M'Culloch v. Indiana Mutual Fire InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1846
  2. Indiana Mutual Fire Insurance v. CoquillardIndiana Supreme Court · 1851

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cochran v. McClearySupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
  2. Bradford v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Farmers' Conservative Mutual Insurance v. NeddoIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
  4. Ohio Farmers Insurance v. GlazeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
  5. State Ex Rel. Standeven v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API