Spaulding School District No. 58 v. Waukegan City School District No. 61
Illinois Supreme Court
1DissentJustice Daily
While I agree with the result reached in the majority opinion, I am compelled to dissent for the simple reason that a franchise is not involved, within the meaning of section 75 of the Civil Practice Act, so as to give us jurisdiction to entertain the appeal.
It is fundamental that this court only has such appellate jurisdiction as is given to it by law, and that it must, of its own motion, inquire into jurisdiction even though such question has not been raised by the parties. (Freese v. Jeffords, 7 Ill.2d 189; Central Standard Life Ins. Co. v. Davis, 7 Ill.2d 266; In re Estate of Kaindl, 411…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Smith v. AllwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- La Salle National Bank v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
- People v. McGowanIllinois Supreme Court · 1953
- Seeds v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1951
- The People v. HordIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.