Lewis v. United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from a decision of the Municipal Court of Appeals, holding that the occupational tax imposed by Chapter 27A of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C. § 3290 (1952), on the business of accepting wagers, is constitutional in its application to the District of Columbia. United States v. Lewis, D.C.Mun.App.1953, 100 A.2d 40. That decision is clearly correct, in view of United States v. Kahriger, 345 U.S. 22, 73 S.Ct. 510, 97 L.Ed. 754, rehearing denied, 1953, 345 U.S. 931, 73 S.Ct. 778, 97 L.Ed. 1360. “Of course Congress may tax what it also forbids.” United States v. Stafoff,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. KahrigerSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- United States v. StafoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Connelly ex rel. Harbar Drilling Co. v. JenningsSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- United States v. LewisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hicks v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1964