Legal Opinion

Hawley v. Hawley

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1903PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From Lane: James W. Hamilton, Judge. Suit by M. J. Hawley against W. B. Hawley and others, in which there was a decree for plaintiff, and some of the defendants appeal. Affirmed.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Moore

This is a suit to compel the specific performance of a contract to convey real property. The facts are that on August 1, 1899, the defendant D. G. McFarland, being the owner in fee simple of lot 4 in block 5 of his Second Addition to Cottage Grove, Oregon, executed to the plaintiff, Mrs. M. J. Hawley, a bond for a deed, covenanting to convey said lot to her on or before one year therefrom, upon payment tó him in the meantime of the sum of $100 and interest thereon at 8 per cent per annum ; and, having been permitted to take possession of the premises, she built a house and barn thereon, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cooper v. ThomasonOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Petrain v. KiernanOregon Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Bohlman v. CoffinOregon Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Precision Medical Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  2. Webb v. StewartOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Gwynne v. GoldwareNebraska Supreme Court · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API