Legal Opinion

Burt v. Washington

California Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1853PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the Ninth Judicial District. The opinion of the court contains a statement of the facts in the case.

1Opinion of the CourtWells, Justice

Heydeneeldt, Justice, concurred.

Murray and others contracted to construct a bridge in Battle County. They employed Wedry and others to get out timber in the mountains, for the construction of the bridge; and paid them a portion of their wages in advance. For the balance, Wedry and others sued and recovered judgment. They had previously filed a notice, in the Recorder’s office of Battle County1, of their intention to hold a mechanic’s lien upon the timber they had cut. Before a recovery of the judgment, the plaintiff purchased and took possession of the timber. The defendant, who is a…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nelson v. LemmonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API