Legal Opinion

Friedman v. Pesach

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 17, 1990PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Fingerhood, J.), entered on or about February 8, 1989, which, inter alia, denied plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment seeking dismissal of defendants’ counterclaims and for a declaration that defendant Pesach is not entitled to be admitted as a general partner in plaintiff Sardonia Associates, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of granting plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment, without costs.

It is axiomatic that where there are no genuine issues of material fact, summary judgment must be granted. (See, CPLR…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dauman Displays, Inc. v. MasturzoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. Garrett v. Unanimity Construction, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. Bush v. ProTravel International, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 2002
  4. Martucci v. Tirro Construction Corp.New York Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Guadagnoli v. Seaview Radiology, P. C.New York Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API