State v. Byrd
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOLDER, Justice.
We granted this appeal to address the validity of an indictment that aggregates, under Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-14-103, the value of stolen property belonging to different owners. 1 We hold that aggregation of value is permissible under § 39-14-103 when a defendant simultaneously exercises possession or control over stolen property belonging to different owners.
BACKGROUND
This case involves the theft of $ 2,644.92 in merchandise taken from nine separate merchants located in the Pigeon Forge area. The defendant, Barbara Ann Byrd, and three other individuals, Robbie Poole,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. GoinsTennessee Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. GilliamCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
- Williams v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
- Nelson v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1960
- State v. O'GuinCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. PierceTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
- State of Tennessee v. Perry A. MarchCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2008
- State v. Gene Ivan AmannsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
- State v. EppsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
- State v. CattoneTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.