Legal Opinion

State v. Byrd

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1998No. 03S01-9705-CR-00057PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOLDER, Justice.

We granted this appeal to address the validity of an indictment that aggregates, under Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-14-103, the value of stolen property belonging to different owners. 1 We hold that aggregation of value is permissible under § 39-14-103 when a defendant simultaneously exercises possession or control over stolen property belonging to different owners.

BACKGROUND

This case involves the theft of $ 2,644.92 in merchandise taken from nine separate merchants located in the Pigeon Forge area. The defendant, Barbara Ann Byrd, and three other individuals, Robbie Poole,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. GoinsTennessee Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. GilliamCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  3. Williams v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Nelson v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1960
  5. State v. O'GuinCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. PierceTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State of Tennessee v. Perry A. MarchCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2008
  3. State v. Gene Ivan AmannsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
  4. State v. EppsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
  5. State v. CattoneTennessee Supreme Court · 1998

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API