Legal Opinion

Carl v. Department of Labor & Industries

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1951No. 31184PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamley, J.

This is a motion for substitution of the widow of appellant as plaintiff-appellant, following appel lant’s death pending this appeal. The motion was heard by Department One and was denied, no opinion being issued. A rehearing was thereafter granted, and the motion was argued to the court sitting En Banc.

George L. Carl, the deceased workman herein, was injured April 9, 1946. The department of labor and industries found that his condition was related to his weak heart and not to his injury. The claim was therefore closed without any permanent partial disability award. On appeal, the joint board…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. OvermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Garrett v. ByerlyWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Calkins v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Nenezich v. ElichWashington Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Tunnell v. Edwardsville Intelligencer, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1969
  2. In Re CasselWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Curry v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Lutch v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Taylor v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API