Legal Opinion

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Penland v. Ashe

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 3, 1941No. Misc. Docket 155PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Keller, P. J.,

Opinion by

Petition for writ of habeas corpus. Pursuant to our practice we granted a rule to show cause why the writ should not issue.

The ‘indictment’, charging robbery, upon which relator was sentenced, in the Court of Oyer and Terminer of Allegheny County, No. 39 November T. 1929, was not presented to the grand jury, nor was a true bill returned. It apparently was prepared, under the Act of April 15, 1907, P. L. 62, but an examination of the original indictment, which was sent up with the district attorney’s answer, leads us to the conclusion that it did not substantially…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth ex rel. Fagan v. FranciesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  2. Com. Ex Rel. Banky v. Ashe, WardenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Mayernick v. Ashe, WardenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Com. Ex Rel. Krannacher v. Ashe, WardenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. Commonwealth v. FranciesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1919

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StanleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Rivera González v. DelgadoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1961
  3. State v. PalmerSuperior Court of Delaware · 1950
  4. State v. PalmerNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1950
  5. Commonwealth v. StormSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API