Legal Opinion · Dissent

State ex rel. Smith v. Boles

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1965No. 12485Published

1DissentCalhoun, Judge

Very respectfully I dissent from the Court’s holding embodied in the majority opinion.

I believe that the prisoner has made a prima facie case in his habeas corpus petition which is supported by his oath; and that the Court has erred in remanding the prisoner without affording him an opportunity to prove his case, if additional proof is deemed necessary. “Assuming that the allegations of a petition for a writ state a case that will entitle the petitioner to a discharge, if proved, the court cannot refuse to hear competent and relevant evidence upon the issues raised by the pleadings.” 25 Am.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Shelton & Luck v. SydnorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1920
  2. Yates v. Taylor County CourtWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Aldrich v. AldrichSupreme Court of Florida · 1964
  4. Aldrich v. AldrichSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. State Ex Rel. Hinkle v. SkeenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API