Legal Opinion

Sigler v. A & B Automotive

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 29, 1994No. 91-14416; CA A80712Published

1Per curiam

Claimant seeks review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order denying her compensation. The Board’s determination that she failed to prove entitlement to an award of impairment is supported by substantial evidence. Claimant concedes that our recent decision in Hathaway v. Health Future Enterprises, 125 Or App 549, 865 P2d 503, rev allowed 319 Or 80 (1994), requires that we reject her third assignment of error. The only remaining question is whether the Board erred in declining to consider a medical report claimant submitted after issuance of an order on reconsideration. We conclude that it did…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Safeway Stores, Inc. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. Hathaway v. Health Future EnterprisesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. Scheller v. Holly HouseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API