Legal Opinion

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Interstate Railroad

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided September 10, 1908PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a decree of the Cicuit Court of Wise county. Decree for defendant. Complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBuchanan, J.

The Interstate Railroad Company, the appellee, in extending its line of road, desired to cross the track of the Louisville & FTashville Railroad Company, the appellant, and make connection with it at Appalachia. The two companies being unable to agree upon the place and method of crossing, or of making the connection, the controversy was taken before the State corporation commission for settlement, under the provisions of clause 3, section 1294-b, and clause 37, section 1294-d of Va. Code, 1904. That commission entered an order authorizing the appellee to make both the crossing and the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Martin v. South Salem Land Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1896
  3. R. R. v. . R. RSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  4. East St. Louis & Carondelet Railway Co. v. Belleville City Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Norfolk & Portsmouth Traction Co. v. Daily's AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1911
  2. Southern Ry. Co. v. ShealyDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1927
  3. Harvey v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1908
  4. Reynolds v. State Board of Public RoadsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API