Legal Opinion

Coast Elevator Co. v. State Board of Equalization

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 2, 1986No. Civ. No. 24362Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CARR, J.

This case presents the question of whether costs for labor and overhead attributable to work performed in the assembly of components of an elevator system prior to attachment to realty are properly subject to the sales tax. We conclude they are and affirm the judgment.

Facts

Appellant Coast Elevator Company (Coast) is a licensed contractor in the field of elevator construction and installation. Coast installs elevator systems *208designed specifically for the buildings in which they operate. The price charged is a lump sum which includes the costs of the system components (which are…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wolfe v. LipsyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  2. Honeywell, Inc. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. Montgomery Elevator Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API