Legal Opinion

Kiser v. Life & Casualty Insurance

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided June 27, 1972No. Civ. No. 1151Published

1Opinion of the Court

HERMANSDORFER, District Judge.

Disposition of Defendant Anniee Kiser’s Motion for Summary Judgment is made pursuant to Rule 56(d) F.R.Civ.P. The Court finds the following facts not in substantial controversy.

Earsel and Anniee Kiser were married on September 7, 1951. Three children were born of this marriage, Robin Lynn, Toni and Rhonda. Anniee filed a divorce action in the Jefferson Circuit Court on June 7, 1966. The action was not prosecuted to judgment before the death of Earsel on May 5, 1967. In the divorce action and on February 8, 1967, there was filed a property settlement agreement,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Corrigan v. CorriganCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1947
  2. Hartley v. HartleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1947
  3. McPhail v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API