Legal Opinion

Krusinski v. Chioda

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 19, 1958No. Appeal, 89PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Woodside, J.,

This is an appeal by the defendant from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County granting the plaintiffs’ motions for a new trial on the ground of inadequacy of the verdicts in an automobile collision case.

The jury awarded $950 to Joseph N. Krusinsld, who became of age between the time of the collision and the time of the trial, and $2000 to Richard Krusinsld and his mother, Anna. The trial judge properly refused to accept the $2000 verdict and returned the case to the jury, which then divided this sum, $500 to the mother and $1500 to Richard.

The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Karcesky v. LariaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Decker v. KuleszaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. Carpenelli v. Scranton Bus Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  4. Patterson v. Palley Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  5. Alleva v. PorterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Martin v. SwiftCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
  2. Padula v. GodshalkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Elza v. ChovanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. Hilling v. Stinson Motor Sales, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. Martin v. SwiftCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API