Finn v. Culberhouse
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Craighead Chancery Court, Western District; Charles D. Frierson, Chancellor; 1. “Wholesale cost” does not mean the wholesale price with 10 per cent, added, but the invoice price at wholesale. 45 Am.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Craighead Chancery Court, Western District; Charles D. Frierson, Chancellor; 1. “Wholesale cost” does not mean the wholesale price with 10 per cent, added, but the invoice price at wholesale. 45 Am. St. 280. 2. There was fraud and deceit shown, or at least concealment. 16 L. R. A. (N. S.) 818; 17 Id. 284; 128 U. S. (32 L. Ed.) 383, 439; 90 U. S. 420; 143 Id. 79; 135 Id. 582, 33 (L. Ed.) 384; 74 Ark. 46; 77 Id. 261; 81 Id. 234. 3. There was no mutual mistake. 91 Ark. 162; 94 Id. 200; 90 Id. 24; 89 Id. 309; 98 Id. 23; 141 S. W. 941. 1. “Wholesale cost” includes cost of…
1Opinion of the CourtMcCulloch, C. J.
Appellants owned a tract of land, containing 591 acres, situated in Craighead County, and appellee was engaged in the mercantile business in the city of Jonesboro, being the owner of a stock of general merchandise. Negotiations were begun between the parties looking to a sale by appellants of their land to appellee, and a purchase by them from appellee of the latter’s stock of merchandise. The negotiations finally resulted in a bargain whereby appellee became the purchaser of the land at the sum of $25 per acre, and appellants purchased the stock of merchandise, the price thereof to be…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McCoy v. Hastings & Bradley Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1894
- Hazleton Tripod-Boiler Co. v. Citizens' St. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Tennessee · 1896
- Eagan v. ClasbeyUtah Supreme Court · 1887
3Cited by1 opinion
- National Railways Advertising Co. v. E. L. Bruce Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1920