United States v. Silverman
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
COOLAHAN, Senior District Judge.
Defendants, William and Howard Silverman, move pursuant to Rule 35, Fed*864eral Rules of Criminal Procedure, or in the alternative, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, to correct, vacate, or set aside their sentences. Both defendants were found guilty of conspiring to transport stolen securities, valued in excess of $100,000, in interstate commerce in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371.1 At oral argument, this Court dismissed Howard Silverman’s motion because it was predicated on the false assumption that he was sentenced under 18 U.S.C. § 4208(a)(2).2 The…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kramer v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1976