Legal Opinion

McClendon v. Sherwin Williams, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided August 15, 1999No. LR-C-98-0568PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

STEPHEN M. REASONER, District Judge.

Pending before the Court is defendants’ motion for summary judgment and/or alternative motion to compel arbitration.

Plaintiff filed this action alleging age discrimination. 1 Defendants filed their motion for summary judgment alleging that defendant Sherwin-Williams Company (“Sherwin-Williams”) has an employee handbook, the Problem Resolution Procedures (“PRP”) — -Employee Relations Guiding Principles Employee Handbook, which provides for arbitration in discrimination cases, with the results being final and binding on both parties. Defendants state…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Pine River State Bank v. MettilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. Deborah Patterson v. Tenet Healthcare, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  5. Crain Industries, Inc. v. CassSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hubner v. Cutthroat Communications, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Dooley v. Dillard's, Inc.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API