Legal Opinion

Bohannon v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 13, 1992No. A91A1862PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carley, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was tried before a jury and found guilty of burglary and kidnapping with bodily harm. Thereafter, no timely motion for new trial or notice of appeal was ever filed. Appellant brings this direct appeal from the denial of his extraordinary motion for new trial.

“Extraordinary motions for new trial are not favored. [Cit.] Such motions are contemplated for events that do not ordinarily occur in the transaction of human affairs. [Cit.]” Cade v. State, 107 Ga. App. 30 (1) (129 SE2d 405) (1962). “ ‘And such an extraordinary state of facts must have been unknown to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cannon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  2. Patterson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
  3. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  4. Goodwin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  5. Bishop v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Balkcom v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  2. Bohannon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  3. Bohannon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
  4. Clark v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  5. Balkcom v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API