Sauerbier v. Union Central Life Insurance
Appellate Court of Illinois
Appeal from the Circuit Court of McDonough County; the Hon. C. J. Scofield, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtPleasants, J.
The material facts in this case are agreed on. On November 1, 1882, appellee, an old line insurance company of Cincinnati, Ohio, issued to John Sauerbier, the husband of Emma Sauerbier, and father by her of the other appellants, a policy upon his life for $1,000. To the agent who solicited and took his application for it, he stated that he wanted the insurance to be made in favor of his wife and children, and so fixed that if any more should be born to him they should share therein equally with those then living. On its face, among other things, the following appears in print: “10. Hame of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Central Bank of Washington v. HumeSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Clinton v. . the Hope Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- American Central Ins. v. McLanathanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
- State Insurance v. SchreckNebraska Supreme Court · 1889
- Glanz v. GloecklerIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. BufordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Alabama Farm Bureau Mut. Cas. Ins. Co. v. PigottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Conyne, Stone & Co. v. JonesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1893
- Pike County Mutual Life Ass'n v. BerryAppellate Court of Illinois · 1919