Legal Opinion

Bobby Auton, Etc. v. Dade City, Florida, a Municipal Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided March 3, 1986No. 85-3157PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Circuit Judge:

Appellants are private water well contractors engaged in business in or around Dade City, Florida. They brought suit under the Florida Antitrust Act of 1980, Fla.Stat. Ch. 542 (1985), section 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2 (1982), and section 16 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 26 (1982) to enjoin enforcement of Dade City Ordinance No. 478. Appellants claim the ordinance, which prohibits the construction of private water wells for drinking, irrigation, cleaning or processing purposes within the city limits, creates a monopoly over water distribution in the city.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Lafayette v. Louisiana Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Town of Hallie v. City of Eau ClaireSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Community Communications Co. v. City of BoulderSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Williams Elec. Co., Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc.District Court, N.D. Florida · 1991
  2. McCallum v. City of AthensCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
  3. McCALLUM v. CITY ATHENS, GACourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
  4. Sweeney v. Athens Regional Medical CenterDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1989
  5. Falls Chase Special Taxing District Elba, Inc. Sunshine Land Development, Inc. And E. Lamar Bailey Associates v. City of TallahasseeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API