Commonwealth v. DiNardo
Massachusetts Superior Court
1Opinion of the Court
Salinger, Kenneth W., J.
The Court concludes that
in an initial proceeding to commit someone involuntarily to the Massachusetts treatment center for sexually dangerous persons under G.L.c. 123A, §12, a vote by five-sixths of the jury members is sufficient to render a verdict that the Commonwealth has not met its burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the respondent is a sexually dangerous person (“SDP”), even though a unanimous vote is required to render a verdict that the Commonwealth has proved that the respondent is sexually dangerous.
As a general matter, a vote of five-sixths of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- King v. Viscoloid Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- General Electric Co. v. Department of Environmental ProtectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
- Registrar of Motor Vehicles v. Board of Appeal on Motor Vehicle Liability Policies & BondsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Commonwealth v. HarrisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
- White v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.