Legal Opinion

Haver v. Yaker

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 14, 1870PublishedCited by 35 opinions

Error to the Court of Appeals of Kentucky; the ease being thus: One Yaker, a Swiss by birth, who had come many years ago to the United States and become a naturalized citizen thereof, died in Kentucky in 1858, intestate, seized of real estate there. He left a widow, who was a resident and citizen of Kentucky, and certain heirs and next of kin, aliens and residents in Switzerland.

Read the full summary

Error to the Court of Appeals of Kentucky; the ease being thus: One Yaker, a Swiss by birth, who had come many years ago to the United States and become a naturalized citizen thereof, died in Kentucky in 1858, intestate, seized of real estate there. He left a widow, who was a resident and citizen of Kentucky, and certain heirs and next of kin, aliens and residents in Switzerland. By the laws of Kentucky in force in 1853, the date of his death, aliens were not allowed to inherit real estate except under certain conditions, within which Yaker’s heirs did not come, and if the matter was to…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Davis

It is undoubtedly true, as a principle of international law, that, as respects the rights of either government under it, a treaty is considered as concluded and binding from the date of its signature. In this regard the exchange of ratifications has a retroactive effect, confirming the treaty from its date. * But a different rule prevails where the treaty operates on individual rights. The principle of relation does not apply to rights of this character, which were vested before the treaty was ratified. In so far as it affects them, it is not considered as concluded until there is an exchange…

2Cited by35 opinions

  1. Guaranty Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Abagninin v. Amvac Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. Dooley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  4. Doe v. Exxon Mobil Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
  5. Flores v. Southern Peru Copper Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API