Legal Opinion

Port Wentworth Terminal Corp. v. Leavitt

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 6, 1920No. 10607, 10608PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Attachment; from Chatham superior court—Judge Meldrim. February 5, 1919.

1Opinion of the CourtLuke, J.

1. A demurrer which is general and attacks the petition as a whole is properly overruled if any part of the petition sets out a legal cause of action. See Hudson v. Hudson, 119 Ga. 637 (1) (46 S. E. 874). The petition in this case was not subject to the motion to dismiss upon the grounds of misjoinder of causes, nor subject to the demurrers urged against it.

2. The motion attacking the plea of the defendant, upon the grounds thereof and as presented, is without merit. The court did not err in overruling the demurrers to the suit, nor in overruling the motion to strike the defendant’s answer.

Jud…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hudson v. HudsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bridges v. Home Guano Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  2. Allen v. SamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  3. Conkle v. BabbCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API