Jackson v. Tucker
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Eberhardt, Judge.
1. It is the general rule in this jurisdiction that expert medical testimony is required to show negligence respecting a physician’s or surgeon’s service to his patient. Pilgrim v. Landham, 63 Ga. App. 451 (4) (11 SE2d 420); Shea v. Phillips, 213 Ga. 269 (2) (98 SE2d 552); Hayes v. Brown, 108 Ga. App. 360, 363 (1) (133 SE2d 102); Murphy v. Little, 112 Ga. App. 517, 518 (1) (145 SE2d 760). And this rule is applicable where on defendant’s motion for summary judgment plaintiff offers only his own lay affidavit in opposition to defendant’s medical testimony. Hollis v. St. Joseph…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Shea v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- Pilgrim v. LandhamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
- Hayes v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- Murphy v. LittleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Summerour v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Killingsworth v. PoonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Anderson v. CrippenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Truluck v. FunderburkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Anderson v. CrippenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Buck v. Alton Memorial HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.