Legal Opinion

Kindelan v. United States

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided July 9, 1964No. Civ. No. 63-167PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DYER, Chief Judge.

The Taxpayers-Plaintiffs instituted this suit to recover the amount paid by them to the Defendant as excise taxes on sums of money claimed to be dues assessed by the Miami Shores Country Club for the calendar years 1959, 1960 and 1961.

The Country Club is a municipally-owned facility operated by the Recreation Department of the Miami Shores Village, a municipal corporation organized and existing under Chapter 26036, Laws of Florida, 1949. The responsibility for the actual operation of the Club was delegated by the Council to the Village Manager, the day to day operations…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. White v. Winchester Country ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Munn v. BowersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  3. Bunker Hill Country Club v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1934
  4. United States v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
  5. The Downtown Club of Dallas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. DeMott v. Board of Police CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  2. United States v. Mitchell B. HoweCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  3. James W. Kindelan and Mary Kindelan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API